589
The proceedings for Habeas Corpus were instituted
when Sir H. Berkeley was recently acting as Attorney General,
during the absence on leave of Mr. Rees Davies, and Mr.Rees
Davies therefore took no part in these proceedings except
to give his sanction to Mr. Alabaster, a Junior Counsel who
had assisted Sir H. Berkeley in his work as Attorney General,
making a formal application for leave to appeal from the
decision of Sir F. Piggott.
3.
#
In the meantime the man Sun A Wan
had been again arrested on another charge at the instance
of the Chinese Government who applied for his extradition.
He was again committed by the Police Magistrate to Gaol
pending the Governor's Order, and he was again discharged
on a writ of Habeas Corpus by the Full Court (Mr. Res8
Davies and Mr. Gompertz) on the ground that there was no
evidence before the Magistrate that the accused was a
Chinese subject. The question of costs was again raised
and argued in due course. On the 8th ultimo the Full Court
gave judgment in the matter.
They differed from the
decision of the Chief Justice in the first Habeas Corpus
case and held that the motion for a writ of Habeas Corpus
WAS
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.